6 min readfrom POPSUGAR

The Real Reason Netflix's "Age of Attraction" Is So Cringe-y

Our take

Netflix's "Age of Attraction" delves into the complexities of age-gap relationships, a topic that has sparked both intrigue and controversy. This series examines the nuances of societal perceptions, gendered double standards, and the underlying dynamics of attraction across generations. While intended to provoke thought and discussion, the portrayal often veers into cringe-inducing territory. By navigating these delicate themes, the show challenges viewers to reflect on their own beliefs about love, power, and the barriers that age can create in romantic connections.
The Real Reason Netflix's "Age of Attraction" Is So Cringe-y

The recent discourse surrounding Netflix's "Age of Attraction" has sparked a wave of intrigue and criticism, particularly regarding the portrayal of age-gap relationships. This topic is far from new; age disparities in romantic partnerships have long been subjects of societal scrutiny, often dissected through the lens of gendered double standards and the complexities of intimacy. The show's attempts to navigate these treacherous waters have resulted in a cringe-inducing experience for many viewers, raising essential questions about the narratives we choose to amplify in mainstream media. The exploration of themes such as these connects seamlessly with other discussions in our publication, including How do I make this dress chic? Like unique/cunt. Lol., which highlights the ways personal expression is often constrained by societal expectations, and I Work in Fashion in NYC—These Are the 7 Summer Shoe Trends in My Capsule Wardrobe, showcasing how fashion choices are influenced by broader cultural narratives.

As the show attempts to depict these relationships, it often leans into the sensational rather than the substantive, leaving viewers feeling uncomfortable and less connected to the characters. The cringe factor arises when the show fails to provide a nuanced exploration of these dynamics. Instead of fostering understanding, it often perpetuates stereotypes, painting age-gap relationships in a sensationalized light. This not only detracts from the authenticity of the characters but also reinforces harmful narratives that may discourage viewers from engaging with the complexities of love transcending age. The question of why we find these portrayals so off-putting lies in our collective awareness of the implications such relationships carry—especially when they are not presented with the depth and respect they deserve.

Moreover, this trend reflects a broader cultural phenomenon: the ongoing dialogue about relationships that challenge conventional norms. As our society continues to evolve, so too does our understanding of love and partnership. Age-gap relationships are not inherently problematic, yet they require careful representation to avoid falling into the traps of voyeurism and sensationalism. The discomfort many feel when engaging with "Age of Attraction" may stem from the recognition that the show does not honor the complexities involved in such relationships. It raises the question of how media can better serve audiences by fostering narratives that encourage reflection and dialogue rather than superficial judgment.

Looking ahead, it is essential to consider how shows like "Age of Attraction" will evolve in their portrayal of relationships. Will they adapt to a more sophisticated understanding of love that transcends age or remain mired in cringe-worthy tropes? As audiences become increasingly discerning, there is a unique opportunity for creators to rise to the occasion and craft stories that not only entertain but also enlighten. The challenge lies in balancing entertainment with authenticity, allowing for a richer exploration of the human experience as it relates to love, desire, and societal expectations. As we continue to engage with these narratives, one must ponder: what stories do we wish to elevate, and how can they contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of human relationships?

Two side-by-side photos show scenes of couples in the Netflix show Age of Attraction Age-gap relationships have long been the object of scrutiny and conversation — from people investigating gendered double standards to asking the sex question of it all. And a big place we see these interrogations play out is on screen. (Just think about the debates "Babygirl" sparked back in 2024.) The latest source of discourse is Netflix's "Age of Attraction," a reality show where dozens of straight, conventionally attractive singles date without knowing how old everyone else is. Once they've found someone to commit to, both of them enter the Promise Room, where they reveal their ages in a dramatic fashion and take their relationship to the real world. Snippets from the eight episodes and the recent reunion have gone viral, with audiences eager to learn if one of the greatest dealbreakers in the dating scene is merely superficial. But ultimately, the TV show's premise proves to be potentially harmful for contestants. Netflix, it seems, is more interested in capitalizing on the taboo surrounding the issue rather than equipping the younger participants with the skills needed to navigate such a complicated situation. Experts Featured in This Article Sofie Roos is a licensed relationship therapist and sexologist for Passionerad. Although the adage "age is just a number" often prevails, our age and maturity level are never an arbitrary factor when it comes to dating, according to Sofie Roos, a licensed relationship therapist and sexologist. "While the number itself is neutral, age comes with life experience, financial stability, social confidence, and status," she says. "All these are factors that tend to lead to an imbalance, and a certain risk for the older partner getting a more leading and dominant role." That very much plays out on the show, where many of the older partners expect to be handed the reins, on the sole basis of their "experience" and "authority." Take, for example, the case of "Age of Attraction"'s Jorge and Vanelle. Sparks fly during the 60-year-old criminal defense attorney and 27-year-old project manager's first meeting. But the couple eventually leaves the show early after an explosive argument where Jorge is "talking at her, not talking with her," as Vanelle tells members of the crew. The whole blow-up reinforces that both sides of an age-gap relationship need to be aware of existing power structures and dynamics. "What we can see in most relationships is that power is determined by who's setting the tone: who's in control, who adapts, and whose needs are being prioritized?" Similar issues surface in 41-year-old flight attendant Leah and 26-year-old business owner Chris's on-screen romance, with the former being controlling and clingy. In one episode, Chris makes several attempts to get some alone time, causing Leah to throw a nasty temper tantrum. My final straw is when he tells her that he's going to take a 10-minute shower, to which she responds with, "I hate you." "What we can see in most relationships is that power is determined by who's setting the tone: who's in control, who adapts, and whose needs are being prioritized?" Roos says. "When someone starts telling their partner who they should be, it's a crystal clear sign of the relationship turning no-equal, and the risk is always greater when someone is much older." Some age-gap relationships can also be built on fetishization, but "Age of Attraction" conveniently glosses over this possibility, assuming that it's always a matter of preference rather than an example of predatory behavior. Viewers may find themselves wondering if certain couples on the show really do like each other for who they are, or if they're more interested in what the other could symbolize. We see this with Andrew, a 38-year-old bar owner who brings 22-year-old social media manager Libby to meet his friends. There is something so unnerving about a group of much older men joking about how it isn't their first time seeing him date someone "not even old enough to rent a car to see him." I couldn't help but cringe while watching this scene, and I kept wondering: does this man even like his partner for who she is? We never see much of what they both have in common, or what else he might like about her besides how she fits neatly into his problematic type. According to Roos, one way to differentiate between a genuine connection and a fetishization is looking at what the person gets attracted to. Is it a unique quirk, core value, or life goal, or is it tied to a characteristic feature that can be replicated in another person? Repeating the same patterns or resorting to "stereotypical ideas and expectations" of a partner, as Roos puts it, is a sign that a partner may have a problematic approach to age-gap relationships. It's worth noting that couples with large age gaps aren't necessarily doomed. Spoiler alert: on the show, Andrew and Libby actually end up together, and so do 49-year-old stylist Vanessa and 29-year-old corporate purchaser Logan. Outside "Age of Attraction," many high-profile examples over the years have also proven that age-gap relationships can be healthy and supportive: Sarah Paulson and Holland Taylor, Harrison Ford and Calista Flockhart, and Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas come to mind. But for a relationship to reach this stage, those involved must not only address the elephant in the room but also accept that it's an important consideration. This means not sugarcoating reality with common excuses like "but they're so mature for their age." "It can feel uncomfortable to talk openly about power, but articulating the differences between you and your partner when it comes to finances, experience, or status makes it a lot easier to avoid the imbalance," Roos advises. And that's important no matter anyone's age. For age-gap couples, it's important to honor each other's growth, no matter what that looks like. Perhaps a non-judgmental space to grow for the younger person, or a sense of stability and security for their older counterpart will do the trick. "But the moment anyone feels like they're raising their significant other, illustrating examples as if they don't understand, and controlling their behavior is a sign to stop and ask yourself what's going on," she says. Instead, creating a third culture is encouraged: incorporating both of your current tastes and life stages to build something new. Mutual trust and respect is the backbone of any healthy relationship, at the end of the day. Sadly, with the way the show was structured and marketed, "Age of Attraction" didn't really care about that. By only focusing on how different each couple was, they failed to show how they could ever be truly equals. Angel Martinez is a Manila-based culture writer, consumer researcher, and content strategist. Her work on the internet, identity, and their intersections has been published in Vice, i-D, Vox, and Business Insider, among others.

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article